Transition Culture

An Evolving Exploration into the Head, Heart and Hands of Energy Descent

Transition Culture has moved

I no longer blog on this site. You can now find me, my general blogs, and the work I am doing researching my forthcoming book on imagination, on my new blog.

29 Oct 2007

‘Climate Change + Peak Oil = Cutting Carbon + Resilience Building’ or ‘Why Malcolm Wicks Really Hasn’t Got This Peak Oil Thing…’

wI had just about got over the sense of outrage and indignation caused by reading John Vidal’s piece, Labour’s plan to abandon renewable energy targets, which revealed Gordon Brown’s administration as truly nailing their colours to the economic growth mast rather than the responding to the climate change one by withdrawing his support for the European target of 20% of energy from renewable sources by 2020. Just about. Then, the next day in a follow-up article, was a quote attributed to energy minister Malcolm Wicks, which read*”at the end of the day, renewables is a means to an end. The end is bringing down carbon emissions”*.

Malcolm Wicks was the UK’s energy minister, then he wasn’t, and now he is again. He was the subject of a coruscating chapter in David Strahan’s Last Oil Shock, which tore into Wicks’s obfuscation on the peak oil issue. This one sentence offers a clear indication that Wicks still really hasn’t got it. It also shows the dangers of designing responses to climate change that do not address the peak oil question. Installing renewable energy capacity is about so much more than just cutting carbon emissions, or at least it should be.

Renewables are also about building resilience, about putting in place the ability of our communities and of the country as a whole, to withstand the shocks that peak oil will inevitably cause. If done properly, renewables can also strengthen local economies, support local currencies, provide a focus for community investment, and lead to the decentralisation of energy generation, which gives power (both literally and figuratively) to the local scale rather than centralising it in distant nuclear or coal-fired power stations.

It struck me that this statement, more than any I have yet read emerging from the present Government, encapsulates the extent to which those in charge of making such decisions (and of unmaking previously made ones) have missed the point. It is especially sobering that such a statement comes from the energy minister himself. From a climate change perspective the primary focus is of course cutting emissions, which is entirely right, but at the same time, doing so without also building resilience is foolish. By resilience, I mean the ability of that settlement to withstand shocks from the outside. It refers to the rebuilding of localised infrastructure so that our ability to meet our basic needs does not crumble to dust at the first sight of an energy crisis or some other such challenge.

In his wonderful Upside of Down, Thomas Homer-Dixon describes resilience thus;

>“In a resilient system, individual nodes – like people, companies, communities and even whole countries – are able to draw on support and resources from elsewhere, but they’re also self-sufficient enough to provide for their essential needs in an emergency. Yet in our drive to hyper-connect and globalise all the world’s economic and technological networks, we’ve forgotten the last half of this injunction”.

It was, I suppose, rather naive to imagine the energy minister of one of the major industrialised nations thinking any other way, but it illustrates for me why the peak oil issue is one that can be best addressed from the ground up. It is entirely wrong to think, as Wicks appears to, that we can reduce carbon emissions elsewhere so therefore we no longer need to install renewables because at the end of the day its all about carbon. This is wrong from two angles. Firstly, as we saw last week in the ‘Big Melt’ report, climate change is happening so fast that we need to be reducing emissions to zero with an almost unimaginable degree of urgency in whatever way we can. Secondly, from a peak oil perspective, energy efficiency and installing renewables are completely different. The first is about reducing consumption, but the second is about putting in place key infrastructure for a more resilient society which is able to function beyond the availability of cheap oil.

Malcolm Wicks has shown clearly that, at least while the present Government is in charge, there is little awareness in politics about peak oil and how responding to it will change solutions put forward to climate change. It cannot be said often enough, you cannot respond to peak oil and climate change just by cutting emissions, you must also, with an equal sense of urgency, build local resilience, in terms of food, energy, medicine and so on. Were Wicks to have said “the end is bringing down carbon emissions and building local resilience”, how different might Government policy look (the answer: profoundly).

Comments are now closed on this site, please visit Rob Hopkins' blog at Transition Network to read new posts and take part in discussions.


John Marshall
29 Oct 2:43pm

There is no point in relying on our leaders in government to deal with all this since they represent those who stand to benefit most, in the short term, from doing nothing.
The true resilience will come from communities acting together to change themselves in preparing for shocks to come. In effect it will be as a result of millions of individual and local group responses.

Tom Atkins
29 Oct 7:14pm

Excellent definition of resilience – many thanks for highlighting that.

We can hardly be surprised by the Labour governments approach to renewables – they do have £20 billion of coal fired power stations planned for completion before 2020!

pete rout
30 Oct 7:56pm

I don’t think that this govt. or any other party will willingly pass down power to locals. Maybe we should start objecting to planning applications for new or widening roads and airport expansion on peak oil grounds.

30 Oct 8:32pm

Let’s face it. Our world is in deep, deep trouble and we are the “troublemakers.” We have to make real, difficult changes yesterday.

Despite the obvious benefits, we are not going to recycle, compost, or talk our way out of this.

Our leaders, being politicians, are not leaders at all but are bound to be followers, who just won’t be there for us in a crisis. So, it’s up to me and you to make the choice of becoming responsible stewards of the earth.

Let’s turn the world right side up as demonstrated through this website. Join us on our journey towards a sustainable present and future. Let’s walk the path to freedom!

Mike Grenville
31 Oct 11:33pm

…and don’t hold out any hope that a change of party will make any difference. In spite of the recently published Conservative ‘Blueprint For A Green Economy’ which mentions Peak Oil sevral times, the shadow energy minister speaking at a Transition Forest Row debate recently on Peak Oil placed himself firmly in the Peak Oil skeptic camp.

A report on that debate here: